Our work is only possible through the generosity of private philanthropy. Find out how you can support our mission and can contribute to our work.
Join the HJS mailing list and keep up to date.
Claims the Muslim Council of Britain plans to set up an alternative to the government’s counter-radicalisation strategy, Prevent, are deeply worrying. Such a scheme risks repeating past mistakes, placing vital work in the hands of unaccountable and inappropriate individuals.
Reports today suggest the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) plans to create an alternative to the Prevent strategy in an attempt to deal with the problems posed by radicalisation. Run through mosques, the scheme will supposedly comprise of panels of ‘community leaders’, former police officers and other professionals, and may use conservative scholars with illiberal views to turn people away from violence.
This suggestion is deeply worrying and echoes previous unsuccessful iterations of the Prevent strategy, in which unaccountable community groups were allowed to act as ‘gatekeepers’ to the Muslim community, and individuals with extreme views contrary to British values were funded by the state.
These manifestations of Prevent suffered from a lack of evaluation, vetting and oversight, something that ad-hoc community provision simply will not be able to provide to the same standard as central government and local authorities.
If implemented, such a scheme would see the most vulnerable people in our society being dealt with by religious leaders and organisations, some of whom may have extreme views, rather than trained and accountable safeguarding professionals – a system tailor-made for abuse and poor practice.
It is also likely to further hinder the successful work of those community-led groups which work with Prevent delivery staff to challenge these issues at present, and which are already smeared as ‘government stooges’ by too many.
Rupert Sutton, Research Fellow at The Henry Jackson Society, said; “Unaccountable and untrained ‘community leaders’ simply do not have the skills or structures in place to be able to effectively deal with the complex safeguarding work counter-radicalisation interventions require.
Instead, any system created is likely to be ad-hoc in organisation and patchy in provision, and will lack the rigorous evaluation, data-protection and collaborative networks that local authorities offer. It will be ripe for abuse and will see vulnerable individuals failed as a result of inadequate intervention.
It is vital more community groups work with government to challenge radicalisation, and stop smearing those within the Muslim community who already do so.
Notes to Editors:
The Henry Jackson Society is a think tank and policy-shaping force that fights for the principles and alliances which keep societies free – working across borders and party lines to combat extremism, advance democracy and real human rights, and make a stand in an increasingly uncertain world. Henry Jackson Society research and events provide key analysis and insight to policy- makers and the media.
The Henry Jackson Society can provide interviews with experts including the Executive Director, Dr Alan Mendoza, and the Deputy Director, Davis Lewin
For interview requests, please contact The Henry Jackson Society.
+44 (0)20 7340 4520