Our work is only possible through the generosity of private philanthropy. Find out how you can support our mission and can contribute to our work.
Join the HJS mailing list and keep up to date.
This is a summary of an event with Dr Tariq Tell, Political Economist at the Centre for Arab and Middle Eastern Studies, American University in Beirut, on 23 January 2013; it reflects the views expressed by the speaker and not those of the Henry Jackson Society or its staff.
To view the full transcript of the event, click here
The wave of uprisings that spread across the Middle East over two years ago have seen the fall of a number of despotic governments across the region. As expected, the rate of success has not been equal across the board, and even judging what constitutes as ‘success’ is, naturally, subject to dispute. Despite these changes, some countries, including Jordan, have managed to steer relatively clear of unrest – for now.
A country on the brink
Jordan has very high levels of internet penetration and many of the social movements and networks that generated revolution in Tunisia and Egypt are working to full capacity in producing a new political discourse. This has broken barriers which previously limited the levels of criticism which could be made of the regime and, in particular, of the royal family. High youth unemployment, a slowing economy, and a huge disparity in wealth, coupled with a great deal of economic frustration, make up a very combustible political and economic mix.
This inequality is highly visible and becoming greater by the year. It has resulted in a polarised society with a small number of immensely wealthy individuals at the top, a rapidly disappearing middle class, and a large amount of people who are struggling to get by.
In the last few months, particularly in November when there was a spontaneous and violent surge of protests against rising fuel prices, people have taken to the streets. The violence was quite extreme, and in some places Jordanian security forces were actually driven out of towns. However, this unrest died down very quickly.
In addition to this economic unrest, a recent article written by the New York Times Middle East Editor claimed that most of the people who took to the streets in what came to be known as the ‘November uprising’ actually preferred Hamzah, the eldest son of Queen Noor, King Hussein’s fourth wife, to the current incumbent to the throne Abdullah II.
A new heir?
As a result of this threat to his position, King Abdullah has pursued a policy of dividing Trans-Jordanian groups to prevent them emerging as a single unified force. Although there are acolytes of Queen Noor who would like to see her son take to the throne, Hamzah has not yet shown his hand, and there is no real mechanism for bringing him to power.
The problem remains that most of the real holders of power are in the hands of Hamzah’s brother, and he would need a real crisis which put the regime in danger, as well as a great deal of external support in order to counter this power.
Whilst Hamzah is better at conveying messages to the general population than his brother, and has a huge advantage over Abdullah in being perceived to have clean hands, whether he will manage to gain power will depend on the amount of support he receives from outside of the country, It will also depend on whether or not he can produce a much more radical and reformist economic policy.
Jordan’s economic obstacles
The basic problem facing the Jordanian regime is an economic one, but it is an economic one that has a political origin.
There needs to be a way of delivering support to poor people whilst reducing the budgetary pressure.
Advice for the West
For the last 10 years Abdullah has toyed with reform, but not changed the electoral system. He needs to work on creating a broader political field where a larger number of political parties can find their place and emerge as possible counter-weights to the Islamist parties.
The key is to allow a certain number of seats to be settled by proportional representation.
How the Americans can bring this about is an open question, because Abdullah is actually quite adept at playing the political game in Washington. It is therefore a difficult policy dilemma, but the contours and outlines are pretty clear; push Abdullah towards a much more open monarchy. It may not be a completely constitutional monarchy, but it should be one with more party political representation than there is at this current time.